ArticleBMC public health2025
A survey of availability, price, and affordability of innovative negotiated anticancer medicines: a retrospective study in Jiangsu Province, eastern China.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Delphi Study to Identify Priority Indicators for Formulary Selection of Innovative Anticancer Drugs in China.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Current status of breast cancer diagnosis and treatment capacity in county-level medical institutions in Sichuan Province, China: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe emergence of innovative anticancer medicines has revitalized cancer treatment prospects, and improving the accessibility of innovative anticancer medicines is a key goal of national pharmaceutical policies. Despite significant efforts by the National Medical Security Administration to reform the National Reimbursement Drug List (NRDL), concerns regarding the utilization of these newly included anticancer drugs persist. This study aims to assess the accessibility of 23 Innovative Negotiated Anticancer Medicines (INAMs) in Jiangsu Province, a developed region in eastern China.
methodsA retrospective survey was conducted across 319 healthcare institutions in Jiangsu Province, with 285 included for analysis. Data were obtained from procurement records of 23 INAMs. We evaluated the use of these medicines based on three aspects: availability, price measured by the defined daily dose cost (DDDc), and affordability.
results43.5% of the 23 INAMs encountered difficulties in obtaining them, and 30.4% of 23 INAMs were very difficult to obtain. There was a notable disparity in the availability of 23 INAMs between secondary and tertiary healthcare institutions. The median DDDc for Group A and Group C showed a progressive annual reduction. The DDDc of 19 INAMs decreased during the study period, while three drugs remained unchanged, and one drug's DDDc actually increased. Family poverty caused by medicines was more pronounced among rural residents. The affordability of rural patients was significantly lower than that of urban patients (p < 0.05) in 2021 and 2022.
conclusionThe accessibility of INAMs improved from 2020 to 2022. However, the accessibility of INAMs is influenced by various factors, and disparities still exist in access across different healthcare institutions and between urban and rural areas. Effective and sustainable policies need to be developed to ensure equitable access to medicines for all patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.