ArticleBMC geriatrics2025
Comparison between two Canadian Provinces on technology use for social interaction by older adults: comparative cross-sectional survey study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic prompted most people to embrace different approaches to their daily activities. Due to various measures to slow transmission in many jurisdictions, older adults were particularly impacted by measures restricting interactions. Our previous cross-sectional study identified barriers and facilitators for technology use for social interaction among older adults in British Columbia (BC), Canada. To investigate whether regional differences exist, the same survey from the previous study was conducted in Saskatchewan (SK), Canada during the same time. We also explored whether education and income levels were associated with older adults' social technology usage.
methodsThe cross-sectional survey was conducted through random-digit dialing to older adults who were 65 or older in BC and SK. Data were analyzed through the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (IBM corporation) and Microsoft Excel. Thematic analysis was performed on the survey's responses to open-ended questions.
resultsThere were 806 participants, 400 from BC and 406 from SK. Education levels were associated with awareness of using technology for social interaction for both BC and SK while only SK had an association between new technology use and education levels. Similarly, income levels were also associated with awareness of technology use for social interaction for both provinces while only BC had an association between income levels to uptake of new technology. From the previous and current study, the barriers identified for technology use for social interactions in BC and SK were lack of interest, access (including financial issues) and physical limitations. SK participants identified perceived low self-efficacy as an additional barrier. For facilitators, BC and SK participants identified current and previous technology knowledge, help from others and motivation to keep social connections. Access to technology was unique to BC while better technology was unique to SK.
conclusionsOur study suggests that when older adults have access to resources to support their technology use, they will use them more, possibly enhancing their capacity for technology use. Future studies with more diverse populations around Canada may identify varying factors for older adults' technology use and regional variations in how technology is used for social interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.