Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40610896›Full record

ArticleBMC immunology2025

Impact of switching from the originator adalimumab to a biosimilar: a retrospective cohort study.

W H A van Poecke, N E F Hooi, T K Mossel, M A W Hermans, P L A van Daele, E M Bunnik, Z Brkic, L K Sels, A A H J Thiadens, P M van Hagen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Biosimilars in Adult and Pediatric Noninfectious Uveitis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

W H A van PoeckeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
N E F HooiDepartment of Pharmacy, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
T K MosselDepartment of Pharmacy, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
M A W HermansDepartment of Internal Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
P L A van DaeleDepartment of Internal Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
E M BunnikDepartment of Medical Ethics, Philosophy, and History of Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Z BrkicDepartment of Internal Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
L K SelsDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
A A H J ThiadensDepartment of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
P M van HagenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
J A M van LaarDepartment of Internal Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
S M RombachDepartment of Internal Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. s.rombach@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdalimumab is a monoclonal antibody that is used to treat autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Biosimilars for adalimumab, including Hyrimoz, have been developed. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and adverse effects of Hyrimoz after switching.

methodsThe cohort consisted of patients treated with adalimumab at the Clinical Immunology Outpatient Department of the Erasmus Medical Center between February 2021 and February 2023. Data were collected through electronic patient files and questionnaires sent to the patients. The primary outcome was the number of flares after switching to Hyrimoz, compared to a similar period before the switch. The secondary outcomes were reported adverse effects and patient experience using Hyrimoz.

resultsA total of 185 patients were eligible for inclusion. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of flares between Humira and Hyrimoz (P = 0.456). Forty-six of the 185 patients reported adverse effects (24.9%). A total of 25/185 (13.5%) patients reported pain during injection, which was the most frequently reported adverse effect. During the course of this study, 60/185 (32.4%) patients discontinued Hyrimoz treatment because of flares (n = 17 [9.2%]), adverse effects (n = 27 [14.6%]), or more subjective complaints (n = 15 [8.1%]) related to the underlying disease. One patient discontinued treatment because of inactive disease.

conclusionThe number of flares before and after switching to Hyrimoz was comparable. However, adverse effects and increased subjective complaints have been reported after switching to this new biosimilar.

Indexed as

AdalimumabBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsDrug SubstitutionAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAdalimumabBiosimilar Pharmaceuticalsadalimumabadverse effectsbiosimilarFlareHumiraHyrimoz

Identifiers

PMID40610896
PMCPMC12224804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.