ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2025
Muscular Versus Myo-cutaneous Latissimus Dorsi Flap in Delayed Breast Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Postoperative Outcomes.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe latissimus dorsi (LD) flap, either muscular or myo-cutaneous, is an effective autologous option for breast reconstruction in cases of poor local tissue quality. The technique is reliable, with low complication rates and good patient acceptance. The surgical incision site impacts postoperative outcomes in terms of aesthetics, psychosocial well-being, physical comfort, scar perception, and sensory changes, assessable through Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a cross sectional study on patients who underwent delayed monolateral LD flap breast reconstruction after mastectomy between 2018 and 2022. INCLUSION CRITERIA: (1) delayed LD flap reconstruction; (2) ≥ 2 years of follow-up; (3) standardized pre- and postoperative photo documentation; (4) proficiency in Italian language; (5) signed informed consent. All procedures were performed by the same surgical team. Patients completed BREAST-Q and SCAR-Q modules at least one year postoperatively.
resultsThirty-one patients were included: 16 with myo-cutaneous LD flaps (Group 1) and 15 with Z-scar muscular LD flaps (Group 2). Group 2 reported significantly better SCAR-Q scores in "Appearance" (p = 0.001), "Symptoms" (p = 0.021), and "Psychosocial Impact" (p = 0.019). In the BREAST-Q LD module, "Satisfaction with back" was higher in Group 2 (p = 0.016), while "Physical well-being: back and shoulder" was similar (p = 0.998).
conclusionsBoth techniques achieved high patient satisfaction, but the muscular LD flap showed significantly better donor site scar satisfaction. Larger studies with longer follow-up and bigger sample size are needed to confirm these findings and optimize surgical decision-making. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
40610810What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.