ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025
Real-World Evidence-Based Outcomes to Measure Upper Extremity Activity in The Brachial Plexus Injury Population.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAdult traumatic brachial plexus injuries result in partial to complete loss of upper extremity function. Outcome measures to assess function after brachial plexus reconstruction have traditionally been obtained in the clinic or via a survey. An objective outcome measure representing a longer time duration in the patient's life obtained in the patient's normal living environment is necessary to assess the outcomes of surgical reconstruction adequately.
methodsA novel method was developed to measure the affected arm's activity in the patient's living environment and compare it to the unimpaired contralateral arm. A secondary analysis of activity monitoring data was used to create an asymmetry index comparing the injured arm to the contralateral extremity. Activity data from healthy individuals was used to create a normative range. The graphical representation visually assessed bilateral arm function for surgeons and patients to understand.
resultsWhile the postoperative dynamic asymmetry index (DASI) was statistically different from the controls, there was no significant relationship with the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome measure or the manual muscle testing grade (MMT). This demonstrates the inadequacies of traditional non real-world outcome measures. The DASI provided an independent, comprehensive view of the patient's volitional choice to use their injured limb during daily living.
conclusionsThe DASI is an objective outcome measure that can measure recovery and improvement of patient function in a real-world setting over a longer duration and allows for a more realistic assessment of outcomes than traditional measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40610795What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.