ArticleUpdates in surgery2026
Liver resection following neoadjuvant immunotherapy: a single center retrospective study.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Expert consensus on the clinical diagnosis and treatment of coagulation disorders related to liver disease].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver resection remains an important treatment approach in both primary and metastatic liver malignancies. However, the impact of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy on surgical outcomes remains incompletely explored. This study aimed to evaluate safety and surgical and oncological outcomes of liver resections after neoadjuvant immunotherapy. This retrospective single-institution analysis included a total of 20 patients receiving immunotherapy (Pembrolizumab, Durvalumab or Atezolizumab) prior to hepatic resection at Mayo Clinic Rochester from February 2019 until October 2023. Surgical outcomes as well as radiological and pathological response were assessed. A total of 20 patients were identified. The cohort comprised primary liver cancer (n = 5), colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) (n = 4), and non-CRLM (n = 11). Overall, severe postoperative morbidity was observed in 4 patients, with 2 cases of post hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF Grade B) and no postoperative mortality within 90 days. Histopathological examination delineated complete pathological response (pCR) response in 10 out of 16 evaluated patients, of whom one experienced recurrence within our follow-up period. Radiological response did not correlate with pathological response. Neoadjuvant ICI therapy showed excellent pathological response rates in highly selected patients, while maintaining surgical safety and expected postoperative morbidity. Standard radiological assessment appears to be insufficient to predict pCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40610783What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.