ArticleSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2025
[Rapid screening of 125 pesticide residues in tea substitutes by multi-plug filtration cleanup method combined with gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry].
Article in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A rapid screening method for 125 pesticide residues of different polarities in tea substitutes matrix was developed using rapid screening combined with gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry （GC-MS/MS）. The targets were separated on DB-1701MS quartz capillary column （30 m×0.25 mm×0.25 μm） with programmed temperature rise， detected by GC-MS/MS in multiple reaction monitoring （MRM） mode， and quantified by matrix-matched solution internal standard method. The methodological validation of 125 representative pesticides in tea substitutes was carried out by GC-MS/MS method. The results showed that the tea samples could be extracted most efficiently when using acetonitrile without immersion in water. The M-PFC TD-1 column had a good purification effect on the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.