ArticleScientific reports2025
A novel hybrid vision UNet architecture for brain tumor segmentation and classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- BRAIN-META: A reproducible CNN-vision transformer meta-ensemble pipeline for explainable brain tumor classification.MethodsX · 2026Article
- From Static Diagnosis to Dynamic Guidance : Evolution of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Neuroimaging.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2026Article
- NeXtSwin-X: dual-branch cross-attention fusion of ConvNeXt and swin transformer for accurate brain tumor classification from MRI and CT.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Leveraging AI solutions for sustainable practice in pediatric radiology: a practical guide and an educational tool.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- An Efficient and Cohesive System for Enhanced Accuracy in Malignant Brain Tumor Diagnosis.Current medical imaging · 2026Article
- Toward Artificial Intelligence in Oncology and Cardiology: A Narrative Review of Systems, Challenges, and Opportunities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Applications, image analysis, and interpretation of computer vision in medical imaging.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper focuses on designing and developing novel architectures termed Hybrid Vision UNet-Encoder Decoder (HVU-ED) segmenter and Hybrid Vision UNet-Encoder (HVU-E) classifier for brain tumor segmentation and classification, respectively. The proposed model integrates the powerful feature extraction capabilities of hybrid methods like ResNet50, VGG16, Dense121 and Xception with Vision Transformer(ViT). These extracted hybrid features are fused with UNet features in the bottleneck and are passed to the HVU-ED decoder path for the segmentation task. In HVU-E, same features fed as input to the classification layer and machine learning algorithms such as SVM, RF, DT, Logistic Regression and AdaBoost. The proposed DenseVU-ED model obtained the highest segmentation accuracy of 98.91% with the BraTS2020 dataset. The highest dice score of 0.902 for the enhanced tumor, 0.954 for the core tumor, and 0.966 for the whole tumor were obtained. The DenseVU-E classifier achieved the highest accuracy of 99.18% with neural network classification and 92.21% accuracy with SVM on Figshare dataset. Grad-CAM, SHAP, and LIME techniques provide model interpretability, highlighting the models' focus on significant brain areas and decision-making transparency. The proposed models outperform existing methods in segmentation and classification tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.