Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40610741›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Risk assessment in sociotechnical systems based on functional resonance analysis method and hierarchical fuzzy inference tree.

Ashish Kumar, Sudhir Kumar Singh, Biswajit Samanta, Ashis Bhattcherjee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ashish KumarDepartment of Mining Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, 721302, India. aksaini4@kgpian.iitkgp.ac.in.
Sudhir Kumar SinghDepartment of Mining Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, 721302, India.
Biswajit SamantaDepartment of Mining Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, 721302, India.
Ashis BhattcherjeeDepartment of Mining Engineering, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology, Shibpur, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective risk assessment is crucial for ensuring safety and preventing severe consequences in complex socio-technical systems. Traditional probabilistic risk assessment methods have limitations in capturing the systemic complexities and the role of human operators, necessitating the advancement of methodologies. The present study aims to develop a comprehensive risk assessment methodology tailored for complex socio-technical systems, integrating the functional resonance analysis method, soft computing, natural language processing, and multi-criteria decision-making. Novel approaches, including expressing timing and precision variability through Z-numbers, employing Z-TOPSIS for their integration, utilizing a hierarchical fuzzy inference systems to model variability propagation, and text classification to compute the amplification factor using near-miss data, were introduced in the study. Further analyses were also conducted to identify critical couplings and paths. Additionally, the concept of degree centrality was utilized to identify functions that are impacted by multiple upstream functions and those that exert influence on several downstream functions. The methodology's application to an anode change operation in an aluminum smelter highlighted its effectiveness. For practitioners, the framework offers a structured, data-driven tool for risk assessment. Its implementation can improve safety, reduce accidents, and prevent economic losses from disruptions and injuries.

Indexed as

FRAMHFITRisk assessmentSoft computingText classificationZ-TOPSIS

Identifiers

PMID40610741
PMCPMC12229593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.