Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40610734›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2025

The temporal dynamics of metacognitive experiences track rational adaptations in task performance.

Luc Vermeylen, Senne Braem, Ivan I Ivanchei, Kobe Desender, J M García-Román, Carlos González-García, María Ruz, Wim Notebaert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Task Failure in Endurance Sports: A Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luc VermeylenDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. vermeylenl@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7370-7152
Senne BraemDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2619-8225
Ivan I IvancheiDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Kobe DesenderBrain and Cognition, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
J M García-RománMind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Carlos González-GarcíaMind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6627-5777
María RuzMind, Brain, and Behavior Research Center, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Wim NotebaertDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Research Foundation Flanders) 11H5619NFonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (Research Foundation Flanders) 1242924N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human task performance elicits diverse subjective metacognitive experiences, such as boredom, effort, fatigue, and frustration, which are considered to play important roles in the monitoring and regulation of cognitive processes. Yet, their specific contributions to task performance remain poorly understood. Therefore, we investigated the temporal dynamics underlying these metacognitive experiences and latent cognitive processes supporting task performance. We used a time-on-task design using a conflict task and analyzed the data using a comprehensive approach encompassing behavioral, model-based, subjective, and neural measures (N = 111). Our results show that changes in cognitive processes can be understood as a rational attempt to optimize task performance and that distinct metacognitive experiences are related to different aspects of this rational endeavor. These findings suggest that metacognitive experiences act as tools for humans to gain insights into the optimality of their cognitive performance.

Identifiers

PMID40610734
PMCPMC12226731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.