ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025
Content-based X-ray image retrieval using fusion of local neighboring patterns and deep features for lung disease detection.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper introduces a Content-Based Medical Image Retrieval (CBMIR) system for detecting and retrieving lung disease cases to assist doctors and radiologists in clinical decision-making. The system combines texture-based features using Local Binary Patterns (LBP) with deep learning-based features extracted from pretrained CNN models, including VGG-16, DenseNet121, and InceptionV3. The objective is to identify the optimal fusion of texture and deep features to enhance the image retrieval performance. Various similarity measures, including Euclidean, Manhattan, and cosine similarities, were evaluated, with Cosine Similarity demonstrating the best performance, achieving an average precision of 65.5%. For COVID-19 cases, VGG-16 achieved a precision of 52.5%, while LBP performed best for the normal class with 85% precision. The fusion of LBP, VGG-16, and DenseNet121 excelled in pneumonia cases, with a precision of 93.5%. Overall, VGG-16 delivered the highest average precision of 74.0% across all classes, followed by LBP at 72.0%. The fusion of texture (LBP) and deep features from all CNN models achieved 86% accuracy for the retrieval of the top 10 images, supporting healthcare professionals in making more informed clinical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40610682What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.