ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Surgical skill assessment using an AI-based surgical phase recognition model for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Objective technical skills assessment in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review of manual, kinematic, and AI-based tools.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Automated surgical phase recognition in pediatric laparoscopic fundoplication using deep learning: a retrospective video-based study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- External validation and clinical readiness of intraoperative video AI in general surgery: a systematic review.Surgery today · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Minimally Invasive and Robotic Gastrointestinal Surgery: Major Applications and Recent Advances.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Surgical video-based temporal action analysis algorithm and competency assessment in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: development and exploratory evaluation.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAutomated surgical skill assessment using artificial intelligence (AI) in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (Lap-C) can be a valuable method for improving the effectiveness of surgical education and enhancing the surgical outcomes of Lap-C. This study aimed to assess the applicability of automated surgical skill assessment using a developed AI-based surgical phase recognition model in Lap-C.
methodsWe collected Lap-C videos and categorized them into training and test datasets. The training dataset was used to develop a surgical phase recognition model that classified the Lap-C procedure into 10 phases. The test dataset was categorized into three surgical skill levels (expert, intermediate, and novice groups) based on predefined criteria. We evaluated the applicability of our model to automatically categorize the three surgical skill levels using parameters derived from the model, including time spent in each phase and the confidence level for phase recognition (AI confidence score [AICS]).
resultsThe overall accuracy of the surgical phase recognition model was 82.3%. Manual analysis showed that the time for dissection in the gallbladder neck in the novice group was significantly longer than in the expert group (P < 0.01), and a similar trend was observed in the model-based analysis. The time for clipping and cutting the cystic duct and artery in the novice group was significantly longer than in the expert group in both manual and model-based analyses. AICS was higher in the expert group than in the intermediate group (P = 0.02).
conclusionWe developed an automated surgical phase recognition model in Lap-C with AI, which was applicable for surgical skill assessment by measuring the time required for dissection of the gallbladder neck, clipping and cutting the cystic duct and artery, and calculating the AICS. Our model is expected to contribute to the efficiency of surgical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40610638What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.