ArticleScientific reports2025
A comparative study of total quality management in healthcare from provider and patient perspectives at Al-Mouwasat University Hospital.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Public and Private Healthcare Service Quality in Trujillo, Peru: Evidence from a SERVQUAL Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Feasibility analysis of total quality management in medical quality management and its impact on work efficiency.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Total Quality Management (TQM) is a strategic approach that aims to improve healthcare services by enhancing operational efficiency and ensuring patient satisfaction. Despite its widespread application in developed countries, TQM's implementation in developing nations, particularly in the healthcare sector, has been limited. This study aims to evaluate TQM awareness, its application, and the effectiveness of scientific methods in improving healthcare services at Al-Mouwasat University Hospital, Syria. A cross-sectional, descriptive-analytical design was used, surveying 390 participants, including doctors, nurses, and patients. The study assessed TQM awareness, perceptions of hospital performance, and the use of scientific and statistical methods to enhance healthcare delivery. Statistical analyses, including the Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Dunn's test, and Tukey test, were applied to identify significant differences in opinions across groups. The study found that doctors and nurses demonstrated neutral attitudes toward TQM principles, while patients showed higher satisfaction with healthcare services. Nurses were more supportive of scientific and statistical methods for improving hospital performance compared to doctors (P < 0.001). Significant differences were observed between doctors and nurses regarding patient interaction (P < 0.001), while no significant differences were observed regarding medical errors. Longer hospital stays correlated with higher patient satisfaction (P < 0.001), while no significant differences were found based on gender or age. These findings underscore the necessity of targeted training programs and organizational support to foster TQM adoption. By addressing systemic barriers, the hospital can enhance service delivery, ultimately contributing to better patient outcomes and sustained healthcare quality improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.