Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40610618›Full record

SynthesisJournal of robotic surgery2025

Meta-analysis of TiRobot-assisted lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease: a comprehensive evaluation of screw placement accuracy and clinical safety.

Yue Zhou, Yupei Dai, Guohang Shen, Lijing Si, Kaiyong Wang, Yang Chen, Ruoyan Wang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yue Zhou *North Sichuan Medical College, No. 234 Fu Jiang Road, Shunqing, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Yupei Dai *Department of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, 750004, People's Republic of China.
Guohang Shen *Department of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, 750004, People's Republic of China.
Lijing SiNorth Sichuan Medical College, No. 234 Fu Jiang Road, Shunqing, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Kaiyong WangDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, 750004, People's Republic of China.
Yang ChenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, 750004, People's Republic of China.
Ruoyan WangNorth Sichuan Medical College, No. 234 Fu Jiang Road, Shunqing, Nanchong, 637000, Sichuan, People's Republic of China. aikokymail@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study focuses on the clinical management of lumbar degenerative diseases and employs meta-analysis methods to comprehensively investigate and compare the safety and pedicle screw placement accuracy of TiRobot-assisted technology versus freehand techniques in lumbar interbody fusion surgery. Although TiRobot-assisted lumbar interbody fusion has shown promise, existing studies report inconsistent findings. A systematic search was undertaken across four major databases-PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The primary outcomes analyzed included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, pedicle screw placement accuracy, facet joint violation (FJV) grading, radiation exposure time and dose, and postoperative hospital stay. The meta-analysis demonstrated that the TiRobot group had considerable advantages over the freehand group with respect to reduced intraoperative blood loss, improved screw placement accuracy, lower FJV grade, decreased radiation dose, shorter hospital stay, and lower ODI scores (WMD < 0, p < 0.05). However, no significant advantage was noted in operative time (WMD > 0, p < 0.05). In summary, this study presents preliminary evidence supporting the superior safety and accuracy of TiRobot-assisted approaches in the management of lumbar degenerative diseases, suggesting its potential as a viable and safe alternative in clinical practice and offering valuable insights for future research.

Indexed as

Intervertebral Disc DegenerationLumbar VertebraePedicle ScrewsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSpinal FusionBlood Loss, SurgicalHumansLength of StayOperative Timedegenerative lumbar diseaselumbar interbody fusionMeta-analysisTiRobot

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.