Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40610610›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2025

The role of untranslated region variants in Mendelian disease: a review.

Nechama Wieder, Elston N D'Souza, Ruebena Dawes, Alexander Chan, Alexandra Martin-Geary, Nicola Whiffin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. What's new in EJHG this autumn.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nechama WiederBig Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Elston N D'SouzaBig Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Ruebena DawesBig Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Alexander ChanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5567-0245
Alexandra Martin-GearyBig Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5818-1962
Nicola WhiffinBig Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. nwhiffin@well.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1554-6594

Funding

Rosetrees Trust PGL19-2/10025Wellcome Trust 203141Wellcome Trust 220134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Untranslated regions (UTRs) flank the protein-coding sequence of a gene. 5'UTR and 3' UTR sequences mediate post-transcriptional regulation via linear and structural elements, controlling RNA stability, cellular localisation and the rate of protein translation. Variants within both 5' and 3' UTRs have been shown to cause disease through a variety of diverse mechanisms. However, for these variants to be routinely annotated and interpreted in clinical genetic testing, we need a better understanding of these regions and the spectrum of disease-causing variants within them. In this review, we systematically assess previously identified Mendelian disease-causing variants within UTRs and catalogue their underlying mechanisms. With genome sequencing becoming readily available and increasingly incorporated in diagnostic settings, this review will provide a valuable resource for the consideration and interpretation of UTR variants.

Indexed as

3' Untranslated Regions5' Untranslated RegionsGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic VariationUntranslated RegionsHumans3' Untranslated Regions5' Untranslated RegionsUntranslated Regions

Identifiers

PMID40610610
PMCPMC7617937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.