ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning-based identification of wastewater treatment plant-specific microbial indicators using 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The COVID-19 pandemic influenced the temporal dynamics of antimicrobial resistance markers and bacterial community across urban wastewater treatment plants.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2026Article
- AiM: urban air quality forecasting with grid-embedded recurrent MLP model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Advances in microbial biotechnology for sustainable wastewater reclamation: recent trends and future prospects.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Review
- Uncertainty Modeling Outperforms Machine Learning for Microbiome Data Analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effluent released from municipal wastewater treatment plants reflects the microbial communities responsible for degrading and removing contaminants within the plants. Monitoring this effluent offers essential insights into its environmental impacts, the efficiency of treatment processes, and the presence of emerging contaminants. To support improved monitoring and source attribution, our study employed a machine-learning framework to identify microbial indicators capable of distinguishing between municipal treatment plants based on effluent microbiota. We collected 57 effluent samples for sequencing of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene from six treatment plants in the Pirkanmaa region in Finland between 2016 and 2018. Characterising the microbiome revealed that although each plant had unique microbial profiles, their overall diversity and richness were similar. This provided a robust foundation for identifying plant-specific microbes. Using ANOVA-F for feature selection, we focused on the genus level due to its informative prevalence. Among various models tested, the Gaussian Naive Bayes model yielded the highest accuracy with the fewest relevant microbes. We identified nine bacterial genera and one archaeon, whose relative abundances predicted the origin of the effluent with 92% accuracy. Our study outlines a framework for the cost-effective and rapid identification of the origin of effluent or changes in the treatment process, demonstrating the power of machine learning in environmental monitoring and management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.