Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40610576›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Explainable artificial intelligence for predicting medical students' performance in comprehensive assessments.

Haniye Mastour, Toktam Dehghani, Ehsan Moradi, Saeid Eslami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. An explainable machine learning approach to predicting carbapenem resistance inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Haniye MastourDepartment of Medical Education, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4893-0998
Toktam DehghaniDepartment of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. DehghaniT@mums.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3931-2880
Ehsan MoradiHead of Information Technology at Vice President for Education, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2270-6963
Saeid EslamiDepartment of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3755-1212

Funding

The National Agency for Strategic Research in Medical Education 994079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprehensive medical assessments are critical for evaluating clinical proficiency in medical education; however, these administrations impose significant institutional burdens, financial costs, and psychological strain on students. While Artificial intelligence (AI) holds transformative potential for predictive analytics, existing models lack the interpretability and reliability required for educational decision-making. To address this gap, a machine learning (ML) framework enhanced with explainable AI (XAI) was developed to predict medical students' performance on comprehensive assessments by integrating academic metrics and non-academic attributes. This retrospective cohort study validated the framework across three universities using two high-stakes assessments: the Comprehensive Medical Pre-Internship Examination (CMPIE; n = 997 students, two-month prediction horizon) and the Clinical Competence Assessment (CCAs; n = 777 students, one-year horizon). A stacking meta-model that combined ensemble techniques (Random Forest, Adaptive Boosting, XGBoost) demonstrated outstanding discriminative performance, with AUC-ROC values of 0.97 (CMPIEs) and 0.99 (CCAs) as well as F1-scores (0.966, 0.994). In this framework, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) provided granular insights into model logic by identifying high-impact courses as dominant predictors of success and individualized risk profiles. These insights empower educators to prioritize curriculum reforms and implement early interventions for at-risk students while delivering personalized feedback for learners to enhance learning outcomes.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceClinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementStudents, MedicalFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceArtificial intelligence in educationComprehensive medical assessmentsExplainable AIMachine learningMedical licensing exams

Identifiers

PMID40610576
PMCPMC12229488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.