ArticleScientific reports2025
Explainable artificial intelligence for predicting medical students' performance in comprehensive assessments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in Undergraduate Health Professions Education: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.JMIR medical education · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in Veterinary Neurology: Comparative Insights From Human Medicine and Cross-Species Technology Transfer.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Review
- Den-SOFA: Dental Student Outcome Forecasting Assistant using explainable machine learning models.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- How does artificial intelligence improve ophthalmology education outcomes?-The mediating role of learning motivation and self-efficacy.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- An explainable machine learning approach to predicting carbapenem resistance inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Comprehensive medical assessments are critical for evaluating clinical proficiency in medical education; however, these administrations impose significant institutional burdens, financial costs, and psychological strain on students. While Artificial intelligence (AI) holds transformative potential for predictive analytics, existing models lack the interpretability and reliability required for educational decision-making. To address this gap, a machine learning (ML) framework enhanced with explainable AI (XAI) was developed to predict medical students' performance on comprehensive assessments by integrating academic metrics and non-academic attributes. This retrospective cohort study validated the framework across three universities using two high-stakes assessments: the Comprehensive Medical Pre-Internship Examination (CMPIE; n = 997 students, two-month prediction horizon) and the Clinical Competence Assessment (CCAs; n = 777 students, one-year horizon). A stacking meta-model that combined ensemble techniques (Random Forest, Adaptive Boosting, XGBoost) demonstrated outstanding discriminative performance, with AUC-ROC values of 0.97 (CMPIEs) and 0.99 (CCAs) as well as F1-scores (0.966, 0.994). In this framework, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) provided granular insights into model logic by identifying high-impact courses as dominant predictors of success and individualized risk profiles. These insights empower educators to prioritize curriculum reforms and implement early interventions for at-risk students while delivering personalized feedback for learners to enhance learning outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.