ArticleScientific reports2025
Diagnostic whole exome sequencing in presumably autosomal recessive inherited retinal dystrophies in an Iranian population.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diagnostic yield and variant spectrum of whole-exome sequencing in Iranian probands with congenital and early-onset ocular disorders.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in genetic testing have improved IRD diagnostics and counseling. To enhance these advances and contribute to an inclusive genetic landscape, this study examines genetic causes in 111 Iranian patients clinically diagnosed with non-syndromic IRD (48% males, > 90% born to consanguineous parents, median age at genetic examination of 37 years (interquartile range 30-42)). Patients were analyzed by ethnicity. Whole exome sequencing using a vision disorder gene panel, including copy number variations analysis, was performed at Erasmus MC. Variants were classified per American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines, with clinical significance assessed via public databases. Genetic causes were identified in 66 patients (59%) across 31 genes, including 14 novel variants. Five patients were diagnosed with syndromic IRD based on genetic findings. Homozygous variants, indicating autosomal recessive (AR) inheritance, were detected in 62 patients (94%). The most affected genes were CERKL (n = 8), EYS (n = 7), and RPE65 (n = 6), with CERKL most common in Turks (n = 6), RPE65 in Kurds (n = 4), and EYS in Fars (n = 3). Variants of uncertain significance were identified in 35 patients (32%). This study identified 14 novel variants and a high prevalence of AR inheritance, underscoring the necessity of tailored genetic counseling and the importance of incorporating diverse populations into genetic research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.