ArticleScientific reports2025
Multiclass leukemia cell classification using hybrid deep learning and machine learning with CNN-based feature extraction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated leukemia detection from microscopic images using deep transfer learning with explainable AI-based analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Recent advances in deep learning for leukemia diagnosis: a scoping review of diagnostic modalities and fusion-based approaches.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Article
- Multidimensional tumor heterogeneity and its role in therapeutic resistance.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Hybrid handcrafted and deep feature fusion for automated acute myeloid leukemia classification using TCMA-Net on a class-balanced dataset.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leukemia is the most prevalent form of blood cancer, affecting individuals across all age groups. Early and accurate diagnosis is crucial for effective treatment and improved clinical outcomes. Peripheral blood smear analysis, a key non-invasive diagnostic tool, often suffers from subjective interpretation, inter-observer variability, and a lack of readily available expertise. Although deep learning approaches, particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), have demonstrated exceptional performance in binary classification tasks, multiclass classification of leukemia subtypes remains challenging due to limited data availability and morphological similarities between subtypes. This study presents a novel hybrid methodology that combines pre-trained CNN architectures, including VGG16, InceptionV3, and ResNet50, with advanced classification models such as Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and the deep learning-based Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP). The method leverages publicly available datasets, the Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Image Database (ALL-IDB) and the Munich AML Morphology Dataset, to classify healthy cells, lymphoblasts, and myeloblasts. Pre-trained CNNs are employed for feature extraction, while the classifiers refine the predictions for improved accuracy. The proposed approach demonstrated exceptional performance, with the InceptionV3 + SVM combination achieving the highest accuracy of 88%, followed closely by VGG16 + XGBoost at 87%. MLP-based models also achieved strong results, effectively capturing non-linear patterns in the data. In contrast, ResNet50 exhibited limitations, likely due to overfitting caused by the small dataset. The novelty of this work lies in the integration of pre-trained deep learning architectures with hybrid classification techniques, enabling robust multiclass classification in data-constrained scenarios. This innovative approach offers a scalable and precise diagnostic tool, improving the speed and reliability of leukemia subtype identification and providing significant potential to enhance clinical decision-making and patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.