ArticleScientific reports2025
Impact of circuit training structures on the acute response in physiological and mechanical performance: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study analyzed physiological and mechanical responses to different circuit resistance training structures in young adults. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the acute effects of four distinct circuit resistance training protocols on blood lactate, heart rate, and countermovement jump (CMJ) mechanical variables in 30 experienced young adults. The training sessions differed in both exercise order (alternated vs. grouped) and training volume (maximal vs. submaximal repetitions): A1 (alternated, maximal), G1 (grouped, maximal), A2 (alternated, submaximal), and G2 (grouped, submaximal). Each protocol included upper and lower limb exercises performed on guided machines with standardized rest intervals. Mechanical properties of the CMJ were assessed before and after each session, lactate concentrations were measured pre-, mid-, and post-exercise, and heart rate was continuously monitored throughout all sessions. Results showed no significant differences in CMJ height between groups; however, power-related variables experienced greater declines in the high-volume protocols (A1 and G1). The rate of force development was also more negatively affected in these higher-volume conditions. Mid-session blood lactate levels differed significantly across groups, particularly between high- and low-volume protocols, although no differences were observed at the end of the sessions. Heart rate varied significantly between the 4th and 12th minute of exercise, reflecting the influence of volume rather than exercise order. In conclusion, training volume appears to be the primary factor influencing both physiological and mechanical responses during circuit resistance training, rather than the specific configuration of the exercises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.