Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40610532›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Evaluation of CEMIP in diagnosis of pancreatic carcinoma in comparison with other traditional markers.

Randa Ahmed El Zohne, Ahmad Kamel Mostafa Abo Zaid, Omnia Abd El Moneim, Ahmed Mohamed Soliman, Dina Mohamed Safwat, Soad A Eltokhy

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Randa Ahmed El ZohneDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 17515, Egypt.
Ahmad Kamel Mostafa Abo ZaidDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 17515, Egypt.
Omnia Abd El MoneimDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 17515, Egypt.
Ahmed Mohamed SolimanDepartment of General Surgery-Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Dina Mohamed SafwatDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, 17515, Egypt. dsafwat87@gmail.com.
Soad A EltokhyClinical Pathology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screening and early diagnosis of pancreatic cancer (PC) are crucial for improving its prognosis. In the current study, we aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of serum cell migration inducing protein in pancreatic cancer patients (CEMIP). This study was conducted on 50 newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer patients, aged from 49 to 77 years. The study also included 20 patients with benign intestinal diseases, and 20 apparently healthy individuals who were selected as a control group for comparison. Practical work was carried out at Clinical Pathology Department, Assiut University Hospital. All groups were subjected to thorough history taking and clinical evaluation. Radiological data and laboratory tests in addition evaluation level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cancer antigen 19 - 9 (CA19-9) and CEMIP were recorded. Pancreatic cancer group had significantly higher CEA, CA19-9 and CEMIP compared to both benign GIT diseases and control group, with (P-value < 0.001) for each. Late pancreatic cancer group had significantly higher CEA, CA19-9 and CEMIP compared to early pancreatic cancer with (P-value = 0.01). For diagnosis of PC, CEMIP was 95% sensitive and 84% specific, with AUC of 0.86 while CEA was 80% sensitive and 65% specific, with AUC of 0.80 and that of serum CA 19 - 9 was 58% sensitive and 69% specific, with AUC of 0.80. For diagnosis of early PC, CEMIP was 90% sensitive and 83% specific, with AUC of 0.72. These results are better than that of serum CEA, which was 75% sensitive and 60% specific, with AUC of 0.52 and that of serum CA 19 - 9, which was 60% sensitive and 58% specific, with AUC of 0.56. Serum CEMIP may serve as non-invasive biomarkers for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer patients in comparison to other conventional biomarkers.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorPancreatic NeoplasmsAgedCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenCase-Control StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenAccuracyCell migration inducing proteinMarkersPancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID40610532
PMCPMC12229677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.