Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40610531›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Machine learning-based prediction of celiac antibody seropositivity by biochemical test parameters.

Signe Ulfbeck Schovsbo, Michael Charles Sachs, Margit Kriegbaum, Anne Ahrendt Bjerregaard, Line Tang Møllehave, Susanne Hansen, Bent Struer Lind, Tora Grauers Willadsen, Allan Linneberg, Christen Lykkegaard Andersen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Signe Ulfbeck SchovsboCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark. signe.ulfbeck.schovsbo@regionh.dk.
Michael Charles SachsSection of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Margit KriegbaumCopenhagen Primary Care Laboratory (CopLab) Database, Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne Ahrendt BjerregaardCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Line Tang MøllehaveCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Susanne HansenCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bent Struer LindDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Tora Grauers WilladsenCopenhagen Primary Care Laboratory (CopLab) Database, Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Allan LinnebergCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christen Lykkegaard AndersenCopenhagen Primary Care Laboratory (CopLab) Database, Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Line Lund KårhusCenter for Clinical Research and Prevention, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnostic delay in celiac disease (CD) is currently a burden for individual and society. Biochemical tests may be used in risk-identification of CD to reduce the diagnostic delay, and we aimed to explore prediction models for CD antibody seropositivity. We developed two prediction models in a cohort study using data from primary care in greater Copenhagen (2006-2015). All patients with CD antibody tests were included. Two candidate sets of predictors were considered: (1) all blood tests measured, (2) tests deemed clinically relevant pre-study or previously studied. Both models assessed test results 5 years before CD-testing. We developed and evaluated prediction models in 10-fold cross-validation framework for each set of predictors. Four machine learning methods were combined in stacked models using SuperLearner. 54,877 patients were included, 672 CD antibody seropositive. Cross-validated estimated area under the curves were 0.68 and 0.63. Distributions of predicted probabilities overlapped substantially between patients with CD antibody seropositivity and seronegativity. Food allergen antibody and IgA were the most important predictors. Biochemical tests had low predictive power but provided methodological insights for future models. These may improve by combining biochemical tests with other clinical information but should preferably aim to stay clinically implementable.

Indexed as

AutoantibodiesCeliac DiseaseMachine LearningAdolescentAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin AMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAutoantibodiesImmunoglobulin ACeliac diseaseEpidemiologyLaboratory testsMachine learningPrediction

Identifiers

PMID40610531
PMCPMC12229532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.