ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning-based prediction of celiac antibody seropositivity by biochemical test parameters.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Editorial: Celebrating women researchers and a focus on non-invasive modalities and innovation.Therapeutic advances in gastrointestinal endoscopyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnostic delay in celiac disease (CD) is currently a burden for individual and society. Biochemical tests may be used in risk-identification of CD to reduce the diagnostic delay, and we aimed to explore prediction models for CD antibody seropositivity. We developed two prediction models in a cohort study using data from primary care in greater Copenhagen (2006-2015). All patients with CD antibody tests were included. Two candidate sets of predictors were considered: (1) all blood tests measured, (2) tests deemed clinically relevant pre-study or previously studied. Both models assessed test results 5 years before CD-testing. We developed and evaluated prediction models in 10-fold cross-validation framework for each set of predictors. Four machine learning methods were combined in stacked models using SuperLearner. 54,877 patients were included, 672 CD antibody seropositive. Cross-validated estimated area under the curves were 0.68 and 0.63. Distributions of predicted probabilities overlapped substantially between patients with CD antibody seropositivity and seronegativity. Food allergen antibody and IgA were the most important predictors. Biochemical tests had low predictive power but provided methodological insights for future models. These may improve by combining biochemical tests with other clinical information but should preferably aim to stay clinically implementable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.