ArticleScientific reports2025
4D hypercomplex-valued neural network in multivariate time series forecasting.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to test three classes of neural network (NN) architectures based on four-dimensional (4D) hypercomplex algebras for multivariate time series forecasting. We evaluate different architectures, varying the input layers to include convolutional, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), or dense hypercomplex layers for 4D algebras. Four related Stock Market multivariate time series are used as input data, with the prediction focused on one of them. Hyperparameter optimization for each architecture class was conducted to compare the best-performing neural networks within each class. The results indicate that, in most cases, architectures with hypercomplex dense layers achieve similar Mean Absolute Error (MAE) accuracy compared to other architectures, but with significantly fewer trainable parameters. Consequently, hypercomplex neural networks demonstrate the ability to learn and process time series data faster than the other tested architectures. Additionally, it was found that the ordering of the input time series have a notable impact on effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.