ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning algorithms for prediction of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after posterior surgery for thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To develop and validate a machine-learning (ML) model that pre-operatively predicts cerebrospinal-fluid leakage (CSFL) after posterior decompression for thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum (TOLF), and to elucidate the key risk factors driving model decisions. Electronic medical-record and imaging data of 318 consecutive TOLF patients who underwent laminectomy between January 2009 and June 2023 were retrospectively analysed (CSFL = 101, 31.8%). The cohort was randomly split 4:1 into training (n = 254) and testing (n = 64) sets. Class imbalance was addressed with two synthetic oversampling techniques, SMOTE and ADASYN. A baseline logistic-regression (LR) model and four ML algorithms-XGBoost, Random Forest, LightGBM and Support Vector Machine (SVM)-were tuned via Bayesian optimisation. Primary endpoints were F1-score and recall; secondary metrics included AUC, accuracy, calibration curves and Brier scores. Probabilities were recalibrated with Platt Scaling and Isotonic Regression, and model interpretability was assessed with SHAP and LIME. Under SMOTE, SVM achieved the best overall performance (F1 = 0.889, recall = 0.881); its Brier score improved to 0.103 after Isotonic Regression. Feature-attribution analyses consistently identified multi-segment involvement, residual spinal-canal area (RrSCA) and related diametric ratios (RrPD, RrDCM), operative time, and intra-operative blood loss as the strongest predictors of postoperative CSFL. A SMOTE-enhanced, isotonic-calibrated SVM provides accurate and reliable CSFL risk estimation in TOLF patients and is freely available as an online tool ( https://github.com/DebtVC2022/CSFL_predict ). The model supports preoperative risk stratification, patient counselling, and peri-operative management, yet requires prospective, multicentre validation to establish broad clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.