ArticleScientific reports2025
Human achromatic flickers and phosphenes thresholds under extremely low frequency electric stimulations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal characteristics of visual cortical responses to transpalpebral electrical stimulation.iScience · 2026Article
- Reproducible magnetophosphene thresholds induced by transcranial alternating magnetic stimulation in humans: a replication study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Blue magnetophosphene perception under subthreshold magnetic stimulation in a human retinal degeneration model.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human exposure to extremely low-frequency (< 300 Hz) electric/magnetic fields elicits a stroboscopic visual perception called electro/magneto phosphenes. The induction of phosphenes is the most exhaustively documented effect of in-situ electric fields. Thus, they are used by international guidelines as the basis for limiting human exposure to extremely low-frequency electric and magnetic fields. This study aimed to estimate the phosphene perception locus and threshold during an electric current stimulation for four different frequencies (20, 50, 60, and 100 Hz) and to estimate the associated in-situ electric field. Phosphene perception probabilities were calculated in 20 volunteers using binary logistic regressions applied to perceptual responses resulting from non-invasive transcranial alternating current stimulation between 0 and 2 mA delivered at 20, 50, 60, and 100 Hz. A dosimetry analysis was done to study the in-situ electric field induced in the retina during the electric stimulation. The data indicate that the stimulation current plays a significant role in the model's predictions across all frequencies. Phosphene perception thresholds were lowest at 20 Hz, while no perceptible phosphene were observed at 100 Hz. The findings of this study are crucial for understanding the mechanisms of phosphene induction and further support the retinal origin of phosphenes. The observed thresholds and trends will inform updates to international guidelines and standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.