Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40610479›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Optimal feature encoding in early vision.

Serena Castellotti, Giacomo Mazzotta, Alessandro Benedetto, Maria Michela Del Viva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Serena Castellotti *Department of Physics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. serena.castellotti@gmail.com.
Giacomo Mazzotta *Department of Translational Research on New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Alessandro BenedettoDepartment of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health (NEUROFARBA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Maria Michela Del VivaDepartment of Neurosciences, Psychology, Drug Research and Child Health (NEUROFARBA), University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human visual system processes a massive amount of visual information very rapidly, requiring efficient coding mechanisms to handle such data within physiological constraints. The biological foundations of these mechanisms remain poorly understood. One hypothesis suggests that the visual system prioritizes the encoding of specific features of natural scenes optimized to maximize information transfer while minimizing computational costs (constrained-maximum entropy criteria). This study aims to identify a possible neural marker of this prioritizing mechanism. Participants were briefly shown stimuli with varying proportions of such optimal features, while EEG visual evoked response was recorded. Analysis focused on the C1 component, the earliest visual evoked component commonly considered to mainly reflect the first cortical response in the primary visual cortex (V1). Results revealed that the C1 component peaks earlier when elicited by optimal features, with a proportional speed-up following the gradual increase of their number. This provides evidence for an early efficient selection of optimally informative visual features in humans.

Indexed as

Evoked Potentials, VisualPrimary Visual CortexVision, OcularVisual CortexVisual PerceptionAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung AdultC1 componentEEGEfficient codingFast visionInformation maximizationVEP

Identifiers

PMID40610479
PMCPMC12229605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.