Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40610455›Full record

ArticleNPJ microgravity2025

Assessing the scientific and economic impacts of the experiments conducted onboard the International Space Station.

Max Wang, Ken Savin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ microgravity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Max WangColumbia University, New York, NY, 10027, USA. maxwang@gsb.columbia.edu.
Ken SavinRedwire, Indianapolis, IN, 46278, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The International Space Station United States National Laboratory has spearheaded space experimentation since 2005. This study assesses the impact of these experiments by linking NASA's log records to scholarly publications and patent inventions. Several key findings are documented. First, the volume of space experiments has steadily increased, with notable contributions from commercial developers and investigators. Growth accelerated in 2012 following the formation of The Center for the Advancement of Science in Space. From the ISS, ~400 papers and 41 patents have been produced, predominantly post-2012 and by public sector investigators. These intellectual products were significantly more impactful, as measured by citations than their counterfactuals-similar papers and patents along multiple dimensions and produced by the same set of scientists based on research on Earth. The differences were disproportionately attributed to NASA-public collaborations, highlighting a fundamental distinction between public and private research in space.

Identifiers

PMID40610455
PMCPMC12229550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.