Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40610229›Full record

ReviewJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2025

Standardization of PET/CT Performance Requirements for Whole-Body Quantitative Imaging: An International Proposal.

John J Sunderland, Ronald Boellaard, John C Dickson, Stephen A Graves, Dale L Bailey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. MIRD Pamphlet No. 33: MIRDpvc-A Software Tool for Recovery Coefficient-Based Partial-Volume Correction.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John J SunderlandDepartment of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa; john-sunderland@uiowa.edu.
Ronald BoellaardDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
John C DicksonInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospitals Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; and.
Stephen A GravesDepartment of Radiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Dale L BaileyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

Project 3: GLP1R and GIPR Agonists in GEP NETs ProjectP50CA302572 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Douglas Robert Spitz · 2025 to 2026
$6.5M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA302572
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, PET scanner validation phantoms, methods, and acceptance criteria for clinical trials are not standardized. This situation generates substantial inefficiencies with many scanners being tested multiple times for different trials. Herein we propose a standardized PET scanner validation paradigm for clinical trials.

Indexed as

InternationalityPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyWhole Body ImagingCalibrationHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhantoms, ImagingReference Standardsharmonizationscanner validationstandardization

Identifiers

PMID40610229
PMCPMC12487750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.