ArticleDevelopmental biology2025
Evolutionary conservation of midline repulsive signaling by Robo family receptors in flies and mice.
Article in Developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Roundabout (Robo) family is an evolutionarily conserved group of axon guidance receptors that regulate midline crossing in a wide range of animal groups by signaling midline repulsion in response to Slit ligands. However, it is not known whether Robo receptors from different species signal midline repulsion via equivalent mechanisms. To examine the evolutionary conservation of midline repulsive signaling, here we express Robo family proteins from mouse in neurons of the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster. We show that Robo proteins which normally function in canonical Slit-dependent midline repulsion in the mouse (mRobo1 and mRobo2) can also repel Drosophila axons from the midline in the fly embryonic ventral nerve cord, and can partially rescue the ectopic midline crossing defects caused by loss of Drosophila robo1, though less efficiently as Drosophila Robo1 itself. In contrast, mouse Robo3 isoforms (mRobo3.1 and mRobo3.2) which do not normally respond to Slit have no detectable effect on axon guidance when expressed in fly embryos. We further show that the differences in midline repulsive signaling effectiveness between fly and mouse Robos is not due to a simple difference in Slit affinity conferred by the Slit-binding Ig1 domain. Together, our results support the idea that the core signaling mechanisms employed by Robo family receptors are conserved across bilaterians, though some degree of evolutionary divergence has decreased the ability of receptors from different bilaterian clades to directly substitute for one another.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.