ArticleExperimental cell research2025
Comparative analysis of 3D culture methodologies in prostate cancer cells.
Article in Experimental cell research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Three-dimensional spheroid models in breast cancer: tumor microenvironment complexity, cancer stem cell-driven resistance, and translational model integration.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) cell culture models are increasingly utilized in cancer research to better replicate in vivo tumor microenvironments. This study examines the effects of different 3D scaffolding materials, including Matrigel, GelTrex, and the plant-based GrowDex, on prostate cancer cell lines, with a particular emphasis on neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC). Four cell lines (LNCaP, LASCPC-01, PC-3, and KUCaP13) were cultured in these scaffolds using the sandwich method to evaluate spheroid formation, cell viability, and gene expression. The results revealed that while all scaffolds supported cell viability, spheroid formation varied significantly: Matrigel promoted the most consistent spheroid formation, exhibiting the best results for LASCPC-01 among the tested scaffolds, though spheroid formation for LASCPC-01 was generally more limited than for LNCaP. Gene expression analysis indicated a reduction in androgen receptor (AR) expression in LNCaP cells across all scaffolds using the sandwich method. However, further experiments using a mini-dome method revealed that the expression of AR signaling genes and neuroendocrine marker genes varied depending on the scaffolds and culture methods. These findings highlight the scaffold-dependent variability in 3D culture outcomes and emphasize the need for standardized methodologies to ensure consistency and relevance in prostate cancer research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.