ArticleBreast (Edinburgh, Scotland)2025
Partial breast irradiation after sentinel lymph node biopsy omission: Is it a valid alternative to whole breast Irradiation? Analysis of the dose to the sentinel lymph node region during whole breast irradiation vs. partial breast irradiation.
Article in Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can be safely omitted in selected early-stage, clinically node-negative breast cancer (BC) patients. While these patients are also candidates for partial breast irradiation (PBI), the dosimetric effects of PBI on the sentinel lymph node region (SLNs) and axillary levels remain unclear.
methodsIn this study, SLNs were identified and contoured in 100 BC patients using pre- and postoperative imaging. Axillary levels were contoured following ESTRO guidelines. Dose distribution to the SLN (n = 9000 data points) and axillary levels (n = 270 data points) were analyzed for whole breast irradiation (WBI) and PBI across different techniques (3D-conformal radiation therapy [3D-CRT] vs. volumetric modulated arc therapy [VMAT]), deep inspiration breath-hold [DIBH] vs. free breathing [FB]), and anatomical variations (breast size, tumor site, and upper breast border).
resultsWBI provided full therapeutic dose coverage (>95 % of the prescribed dose) to 65 % of SLNs, compared to only 10 % (3D-CRT) and 3 % (VMAT) with PBI. DIBH significantly reduced dose distribution to SLN and axillary levels compared to FB. Lower incidental dose coverage was also observed in patients with medial/central tumors, smaller breasts, and lower upper breast borders.
conclusionThese results demonstrate that PBI delivers substantially lower incidental dose to the SLN than WBI. Since patients in the INSEMA and SOUND trials were predominantly treated with WBI, combining SLNB omission with PBI should not be considered a standard approach and warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.