ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2025
Males but not females report genital sensations evoked by fixed-parameter stimulation of somatosensory cortex.
Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rethinking sexual response: are erogenous zones-including nipple stimulation-more than secondary stimuli? A meta-analysis.Sexual medicine · 2026Article
- Cervicothoracic trans-spinal magnetic stimulation: effect of coil position and orientation on spinal motor evoked potentials.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The localization of the human genital cortex has been debated since its unusual placement in Wilder Penfield's somatosensory homunculus. While male and female genitalia are different, it remains unclear how these external differences are mapped onto the male and female brain. We investigated genital representation in the human somatosensory cortex by patient-report of sensations evoked by fixed parameter electrical stimulation during awake craniotomies. We find a reproducible genital representation in male subjects (n = 3) at the somatotopically appropriate location between the legs situated in the dorsal postcentral gyrus and sulcus. Our findings contradict early stimulation maps derived by Penfield and colleagues, which indicated an absence of genital responses in this brain region, but align with more recent imaging data from males and females that described blood-flow responses to genital stimulation at these coordinates. Surprisingly, however, we find no evidence for stimulation-evoked genital sensations in the postcentral gyrus and sulcus of females (n = 5) in line with Penfield's earlier conclusions. Specifically, females reported no genital sensations, but often leg sensations, when stimulated at the putative coordinates of female genital cortex. We conclude that reports of genital sensations differ between male and female somatosensory cortex upon stimulation. Our observations add to the growing evidence that genital representations differ between males and females.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.