Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40608833›Full record

ArticleeLife2025

Elucidating the selection mechanisms in context-dependent computation through low-rank neural network modeling.

Yiteng Zhang, Jianfeng Feng, Bin Min

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yiteng ZhangSchool of Data Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5192-521X
Jianfeng FengSchool of Data Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5987-2258
Bin MinLingang Laboratory, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1006-9629

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology (China) STI2030-Major Project, 2021ZD0204105National Natural Science Foundation of China 32271149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans and animals exhibit a remarkable ability to selectively filter out irrelevant information based on context. However, the neural mechanisms underlying this context-dependent selection process remain elusive. Recently, the issue of discriminating between two prevalent selection mechanisms-input modulation versus selection vector modulation-with neural activity data has been highlighted as one of the major challenges in the study of individual variability underlying context-dependent decision-making (CDM). Here, we investigated these selection mechanisms through low-rank neural network modeling of the CDM task. We first showed that only input modulation was allowed in rank-one neural networks and additional dimensions of network connectivity were required to endow neural networks with selection vector modulation. Through rigorous information flow analysis, we gained a mechanistic understanding of why additional dimensions are required for selection vector modulation and how additional dimensions specifically contribute to selection vector modulation. This new understanding then led to the identification of novel neural dynamical signatures for selection vector modulation at both single neuron and population levels. Together, our results provide a rigorous theoretical framework linking network connectivity, neural dynamics, and selection mechanisms, paving the way towards elucidating the circuit mechanisms when studying individual variability in context-dependent computation.

Indexed as

Decision MakingModels, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerAnimalsHumansNerve NetNeuronscognitive controlcontext-dependent computationdecision makingindividual variabilitylow-rank RNNneural dynamicsneurosciencerat

Identifiers

PMID40608833
PMCPMC12226023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.