Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40608808›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

The global scope and components of family-centred care for preterm infants: An umbrella review.

Jacklyn Adella, Francesca Giulia Maraschin, Shobhana Nagraj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jacklyn AdellaNuffield Department of Medicine, Health Systems Collaborative, Centre for Global Health Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4895-894X
Francesca Giulia MaraschinNuffield Department of Medicine, Health Systems Collaborative, Centre for Global Health Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Shobhana NagrajNuffield Department of Medicine, Health Systems Collaborative, Centre for Global Health Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preterm birth is the leading cause of under-five mortality. Family-centred care (FCC) interventions may improve outcomes related to prematurity and may be used to address this issue to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. We aimed to consolidate the scope of evidence and components of FCC interventions for preterm infants globally and see its relevance for low-resource settings. We conducted an umbrella review informed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidelines. Systematic literature reviews evaluating FCC in the preterm or high-risk infant population and their families were identified from six databases. Keywords included "family-centred care", "premature infants", "neonatal intensive care unit", and their relevant synonyms. Quality appraisal was conducted using the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses and data extraction performed to an agreed table. Thematic analysis was carried out to categorise the components of FCC interventions. Forty-four reviews were included in the umbrella review. Outcomes were observed on the parents in 40 studies, the infant in 19, the health care provider in 13, and the health system in 7. Most studies focused on inpatient settings (79.6%) and were conducted primarily in high-income countries (92.3%). The components identified were general FCC, health system design, parent support, partnership in care, and information and communication. Overall, FCC interventions have a positive impact on parental, infant, and health system outcomes, with consistent reporting of FCC impact on parental well-being and satisfaction, infant length of stay, feeding and growth, and hospital readmission rates. FCC interventions have the potential to improve preterm infant health system outcomes. To maximise impact, FCC interventions need to be further explored in low-resource and post-discharge settings, where the burden of premature infant morbidity and mortality is highest. Evidence in both these settings is scarce. Future research efforts should aim to close these evidence gaps.

Identifiers

PMID40608808
PMCPMC12225843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.