ArticlePloS one2025
Factors affecting microbial safety behavior of beef handlers working in major beef retailers in Mizan-Aman, Southwest Ethiopia.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBeef is a key component of human diet but also a favorable medium for microbial growth. However, research has largely overlooked major beef retailers and the specific roles of handlers, missing critical points for intervention. This study aims to address these gaps to support targeted microbial safety measures based on handlers' specific roles in beef processing.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted in Mizan-Aman, Southwest Ethiopia, from February 20 to April 20, 2024. The sample size was determined using a single population proportion formula, resulting in the inclusion of 372 participants, yielding a response rate of 360 (96.8%). Beef retailers were randomly selected, while beef handlers were chosen through systematic sampling technique. Data collection was done using a structured questionnaire and observation checklist. Following a quality assessment, the data were analyzed using STATA 16, employing descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Bivariable analysis (p ≤ 0.25) was performed to identify variables for multivariable analysis. Statistical significance was assessed using adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), with a significance level set at p < 0.05.
resultsFindings indicated that a significant proportion of beef handlers demonstrated inadequate knowledge (61%), negative attitudes (58%), and insufficient safety practices (55%). Among several factors associated with knowledge, attitude and practice of beef handlers, training in food safety was linked to good knowledge (AOR = 4.17, 95% CI: 1.15-15.12), while the role of a waiter was associated with both good knowledge (AOR = 4.5, 95% CI: 1.83-10.95), and more favorable attitudes (AOR = 2.8, 95% CI: 1.02-7.31). On the other hand, poor knowledge (AOR = 4.40, 95% CI: 2.44-7.94) and unfavorable attitudes (AOR = 4.84, 95% CI: 2.62-8.95) were significantly correlated with inadequate microbial safety practices.
conclusionMany beef handlers lack sufficient knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding beef safety, regardless of their job roles. Improving microbial safety requires strategies such as formal education, training, health checks, and certification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.