ArticlePloS one2025
Predicting semantic segmentation quality in laryngeal endoscopy images.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- BAGLS-VF: a comprehensive dataset for glottal area and vocal fold segmentations.BMC research notes · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopy is a major tool for assessing the physiology of inner organs. Contemporary artificial intelligence methods are used to fully automatically label medical important classes on a pixel-by-pixel level. This so-called semantic segmentation is for example used to detect cancer tissue or to assess laryngeal physiology. However, due to the diversity of patients presenting, it is necessary to judge the segmentation quality. In this study, we present a fully automatic system to evaluate the segmentation performance in laryngeal endoscopy images. We showcase on glottal area segmentation that the predicted segmentation quality represented by the intersection over union metric is on par with human raters. Using a traffic light system, we are able to identify problematic segmentation frames to allow human-in-the-loop improvements, important for the clinical adaptation of automatic analysis procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.