Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40608705›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Graph attention networks for predicting drug-gene association of glucocorticoid in oral squamous cell carcinoma: A comparison with GraphSAGE.

Monal Yuwanati, Santhanamari Thiyagarajan, Kranti Kiran Reddy Ealla, Yash Jain, Pradeep Kumar Yadalam, Senthil Murugan Mullainathan, Anima Nanda, Samir Sahoo, Daniel Ejim Uti

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Monal YuwanatiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
Santhanamari ThiyagarajanDepartment of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Northern Border University, Arar, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Kranti Kiran Reddy EallaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Malla Reddy Institute of Dental Sciences, Malla Reddy Vishwavidyapeeth, Hyderabad, India.
Yash JainDepartment of Dentistry, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Pradeep Kumar YadalamDepartment of Periodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, TamilNadu, India.
Senthil Murugan MullainathanDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, India.
Anima NandaDepartment of Biomedical, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Samir SahooDepartment of General Medicine IMS and SUM Hospital, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Daniel Ejim UtiDepartment of Biochemistry/Research and Publications, Kampala International University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1129-1785

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present study evaluates the effectiveness of Graph Attention Networks (GAT) and GraphSAGE in predicting drug-gene interactions for glucocorticoids in oral squamous cell carcinoma, thereby aiding in developing better treatment strategies. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe utilized a curated dataset containing known drug-gene interactions and corresponding molecular profiles. Both GAT and GraphSAGE were implemented to model the biological networks of drug-gene relationships. Experiments were conducted to evaluate each model's performance using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics.

resultsThe network analysis details 174 nodes and 409 edges with a sparse structure, moderate connectivity, and low clustering, indicating a diverse node connection. The analysis confirms a fully connected network with efficient computation time. In comparing models, GraphSAGE outperforms GAT with higher accuracy (0.949 vs. 0.947), better macro-averaged F1 score (0.275 vs. 0.195), and higher AUC-ROC (0.780 vs. 0.514), suggesting stronger class-distinction capabilities. Both models achieve high accuracy, but GraphSAGE's superior scores in F1 and AUC-ROC indicate a more effective balance in precision and recall. The results demonstrated that both GAT and GraphSAGE effectively predicted drug-gene associations. However, GAT outperformed GraphSAGE, achieving higher accuracy and F1 scores in identifying relevant glucocorticoid interactions in the context of OSCC.

conclusionOur findings highlight the efficacy of advanced graph-based methodologies in elucidating drug interactions in OSCC. GAT, in particular, shows promise for accurately predicting drug-gene associations, which may facilitate personalized therapeutic approaches. Future research will focus on enhancing these models and exploring additional drug compounds to understand their applicability in OSCC treatment.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellGlucocorticoidsMouth NeoplasmsGene Regulatory NetworksHumansGlucocorticoids

Identifiers

PMID40608705
PMCPMC12225800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.