ArticleCadernos de saude publica2025
[Women's health care in the state of São Paulo, Brazil: an evaluation of primary health care services].
Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the organization of women's health care within primary health care services. This evaluative research utilized indicators derived from a survey conducted in the state of São Paulo, Brazil, in 2022 by the QualiAB system. A total of 2,269 services, located in 356 municipalities, were evaluated using an assessment matrix comprising 46 indicators grouped into five domains. Overall performance was estimated based on the average score obtained. Using the K-means clustering technique, the services were grouped into three quality clusters, and associations between these clusters and service characteristics were analyzed using multinomial linear regression. The overall performance of the 2,269 evaluated services was 66.4%. The highest performance was observed in the "postpartum care" domain (81.6%), followed by "reproductive planning" (68.8%), "breast and cervical cancer prevention and screening" (68.6%), "prenatal care" (61.9%), and "care for women in situations of violence" (47.2%). A higher frequency of "traditional" actions related to maternal and child health was observed, along with a lower frequency of health education and promotion activities. The variables "population size (> 200,000 inhabitants)", "recruitment of pregnant women by community agents", "use of epidemiological data", and "frequency of team meetings" were positively associated with higher quality. The identified weaknesses lie within the governance of local teams and municipal management, highlighting the need for professional development and the reorganization of work processes to effectively implement the guidelines for comprehensive women's health care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.