Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40608659›Full record

ArticleCadernos de saude publica2025

[Degree of implementation of patient safety in primary health care in three Brazilian capitals].

Taise Rocha Macedo, Maria Cristina Marino Calvo

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Cadernos de saude publica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Taise Rocha MacedoSecretaria de Estado da Saúde de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0002-9304-3215
Maria Cristina Marino CalvoUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brasil.ORCID 0000-0001-8661-7228

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient safety is concerned with reducing risks and harm related to healthcare and must be implemented within primary care to improve the quality of care provided. This study aimed to determine the degree of implementation of patient safety in primary care in the capitals of Southern Brazil. This is an evaluative study employing an implementation analysis via multiple case studies, conducted in the capitals of each state in Southern Brazil. Patient safety was found to be partially implemented in these capitals (46.6%, 62.5% and 53.3%), with no component achieving a satisfactory level of implementation in the evaluated cases. The care processes component obtained the highest scores (62.5%, 69.2% and 57.5%), whereas the continuing education component recorded the lowest percentages of implementation (33.7%, 56.7% and 27.5%). The components of resources, care processes, safety culture, and ongoing education need to be strengthened to fully implement patient safety and promote safer healthcare within primary care.

Indexed as

Patient SafetyPrimary Health CareBrazilHumansQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID40608659
PMCPMC12212291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.