ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2025
Content validation of the Qualipreterm: quality of preterm infant follow-up in Primary Health Care.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo validate the content of the Qualipreterm guide, which assesses the quality of follow-up care for preterm infants in Primary Health Care.
methodsWe conducted a methodological study using the Delphi technique. In the first round, we included 17 judges (nurses, master's degree holders, and doctoral experts in neonatal health). In the second round, we included 20 nurses actively working in Primary Health Care. We performed data analysis using Cronbach's alpha, with a minimum acceptable value of 0.70.
resultsDuring the content validation phase, the overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.989, and across the domains, it exceeded 0.957. For the "Clarity" and "Comprehensibility" dimension, Cronbach's alpha was 0.993 in the second round, demonstrating satisfactory agreement among the items. All alpha coefficients surpassed 0.876 when distributed across the domains.
conclusionsThe evaluative Qualipreterm guide's content achieved validation criteria and incorporated the received recommendations. In the final version, it contained 64 items.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.