Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40608628›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria2025

Molecular survey of tick-borne pathogens in domestic dogs from a rural region within the buffer zone of a conservation unit in the Brazilian Caatinga biome.

Bruno Vinicios Silva de Araújo, Larissa Daniele Aires Oliveira do Carmo, Sthenia Santos Albano Amora, João Marcelo Azevedo de Paula Antunes, Francisco de Assis Leite Souza, Paulo Henrique Dantas Marinho, Juliana Fortes Vilarinho Braga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de parasitologia veterinaria = Brazilian journal of veterinary parasitology : Orgao Oficial do Colegio Brasileiro de Parasitologia Veterinaria, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bruno Vinicios Silva de AraújoPrograma de Pós-graduação em Biociência Animal, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco - UFRPE, Recife, PE, Brasil.
Larissa Daniele Aires Oliveira do CarmoMédica Veterinária, Mossoró, RN, Brasil.
Sthenia Santos Albano AmoraPrograma de Pós-graduação em Ambiente, Tecnologia e Sociedade, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido - UFERSA, Mossoró, RN, Brasil.
João Marcelo Azevedo de Paula AntunesHospital Veterinário Universitário, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido - UFERSA, Mossoró, RN, Brasil.
Francisco de Assis Leite SouzaLaboratório de Diagnóstico Animal, Departamento de Morfologia e Fisiologia Animal, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco - UFRPE, Recife, PE, Brasil.
Paulo Henrique Dantas MarinhoEscola Estadual de Educação Profissional Professora Maria Elsa Porto Costa Lima, Secretaria de Educação do Estado do Ceará -SEDUC, Aracati, CE, Brasil.
Juliana Fortes Vilarinho BragaUniversidade Federal do Piauí - UFPI, Campus Professora Cinobelina Elvas, Bom Jesus, PI, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5907-3798

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although previous studies have identified Ehrlichia canis, Anaplasma platys, Babesia vogeli, and Hepatozoon canis in dogs in Northeastern Brazil, research on their presence within and around environmental conservation units remains scarce. The present study investigated the presence of tick-borne pathogens in domestic dogs in the rural region of Baraúna, within the buffer zone of the Furna Feia National Park (FFNP), an environmental conservation unit in the Caatinga biome of Rio Grande do Norte, northeastern Brazil. Blood samples from 52 dogs were collected to detect the presence of A. platys (16S rRNA), B. vogeli (18S rRNA), E. canis (16S rRNA), and H. canis (18S rRNA) DNA by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). More than 90% of dogs were found to be infected with at least one pathogen, predominantly E. canis and H. canis. Co-infections (38.5%) and multi-infections with three (19.2%) and four (5.8%) pathogens were also frequent and diverse, underscoring the complexity of tick-borne diseases in this region. These findings highlight the epidemiological importance of dog-associated pathogens, and raise concerns regarding their potential transmission to wildlife within the conservation unit, as some of these pathogens have been previously described in wild mammalian species inhabiting the FFNP, including endangered species.

Indexed as

BabesiaDog DiseasesTick-Borne DiseasesAnaplasmaAnimalsBrazilDogsFemaleMaleRural Population

Identifiers

PMID40608628
PMCPMC12212063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.