ArticleRevista de saude publica2025
Psychometric study of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale with health professionals.
Article in Revista de saude publica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk of Sarcopenia, Anxiety and Depression Among Healthcare Professionals in Disability Care Facilities.Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls · 2026Article
- Prolonged Effects on Frontline Caregivers: Occupational Stress and Mental Well-Being in Transformed Healthcare Environments Post-COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- Serum FGL2 is correlated with the severity and psychological status of diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the validity of the internal structure and reliability of the Brazilian version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) for screening depressive and anxious symptoms in primary care health professionals.
methodsA psychometric study carried out with health professionals from primary health care services in a municipality in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, in 2023. The quality of the HADS instrument was assessed by internal structural validity, using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), and internal consistency, using Cronbach's Alpha and McDonald's Omega coefficients.
results217 health professionals took part in the study, of both sexes and from different professional categories, such as doctors, nurses, nursing technicians and assistants, dentists and oral health assistants, and community health workers. The EFA showed the two-factor model, anxiety and depression, as originally proposed. The CFA confirmed that the two-dimensional model was a good fit for the sample investigated. The Alpha and Omega values were 0.833 and 0.838 for anxiety and 0.763 and 0.766 for depression, respectively. Both indicated acceptable reliability.
conclusionsThe HADS is a valid and reliable instrument for screening symptoms of anxiety and depression in primary care professionals in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.