Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40608480›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2026

Coping with Ineffective Overlap in Multilocus Phylogenetics.

Ana Serra Silva, Karen Siu-Ting, Christopher J Creevey, Davide Pisani, Mark Wilkinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ana Serra SilvaHerpetology Lab, Science Group, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8020-3227
Karen Siu-TingSchool of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Chlorine Gardens, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3698-1755
Christopher J CreeveySchool of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Chlorine Gardens, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7183-1555
Davide PisaniSchool of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Queens Road, Bristol BS8 1RL, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0949-6682
Mark WilkinsonHerpetology Lab, Science Group, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.

Funding

Leverhulme Trust RPG-2021-433Natural Environment Research Council NE/L002434/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Missing data is a long-standing issue in phylogenetic inference, which often results in high levels of taxonomic instability, obscuring otherwise well-supported relationships. Multiple approaches have been developed to deal with the negative effects of ineffective overlap on tree resolution, often by identifying taxa for removal. Here, we repurpose a heuristic method developed to identify unstable taxa in morphological data matrices, concatabominations, and combine it with a novel gene-tree jackknifing on matrix representation of trees to identify candidates for targeted sequencing. Using a multilocus caecilian data set, we illustrate the method's capacity to identify candidate taxa and loci for additional sequencing, compare the results with those of the mathematics-based gene sampling sufficiency approach, and explore the terrace space associated with the multilocus data set. We show that our approach yields tractable numbers of loci/taxa for targeted sequencing that successfully mitigate topological instability due to ineffective overlap, even when modest amounts of data are added.

Indexed as

ClassificationPhylogenyAnimalsIneffective overlapmatrix representation of splitsphylogenomicstargeted taxon/locus samplingtaxonomic instabilityterraces

Identifiers

PMID40608480
PMCPMC12805666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.