ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2025
Operant demand for cigarettes varies by unit of purchase: Comparing purchasing of packs and individual cigarettes.
Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The operant demand cigarette purchase task conventionally prompts participants to report imagined purchases in units of single cigarettes. Although this purchasing modality diverges from the units deployed in real purchasing scenarios (i.e., packs of 20), no research has examined how simulated purchasing of the more ecologically valid unit of cigarette packs maps onto single cigarette purchasing metrics. A sample of 212 participants in this study reported hypothetical cigarette purchases across three iterations of the cigarette purchase task. Two of these collected responses in a binary format-would or would not purchase-at yoked unit prices, where tasks were distinguished as purchases of single cigarettes or packs of cigarettes. This binary framework permitted a simplified probabilistic description of purchasing that maintained a consistent timeframe. Participants also completed the standard cigarette purchase task, reporting the quantity of single cigarettes they would purchase and consume at each unit price. Purchasing breakpoint, or the highest price at which participants reported purchasing cigarettes, was broadly consistent across these tasks, weakly so when comparing purchases made on the binary tasks (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.