ArticleJMIR infodemiology2025
Messaging and Information in Mental Health Communication on Social Media: Computational and Quantitative Analysis.
Article in JMIR infodemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mental health organizations have the vital and difficult task of shaping public discourse and providing important information. Social media platforms such as X (formerly known as Twitter) serve as such communication channels, and analyzing organizational health information offers valuable insights into their guidance and linguistic patterns, which can enhance communication strategies for health campaigns and interventions. The findings inform strategies to enhance public engagement, trust, and the effectiveness of mental health messaging. Objective: This study examines the predominant themes and linguistic characteristics of messages from mental health organizations, focusing on how these messages' structure information, engage audiences, and contribute to public information and discourse on mental health. Methods: A computational content analysis was conducted to identify thematic clusters within messages from 17 unique mental health organizations, totaling 326,967 tweets and approximately 7.2 million words. In addition, Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) was used to analyze affective, social, and cognitive processes in messages with positive versus negative sentiment. Differences in sentiment were assessed using a Mann-Whitney U test. Results: The analysis revealed that organizations predominantly emphasize themes related to community, well-being, and workplace mental health. Sentiment analysis indicated significant differences in affect (P<.001), social processes (P<.001), and cognitive processing (P<.001) between positive and negative messages, with effect sizes that were small to medium. Notably, while messages frequently conveyed positive sentiment and social engagement, there was a lower emphasis on cognitive processing, suggesting that more complex discussions about mental health challenges may be underrepresented. Conclusions: Organizations use social media to promote engagement and support, often through positively valanced messages. Yet the limited emphasis on cognitive processing may indicate a gap in how organizations address more nuanced or complex mental health issues. Findings demonstrate the need for communication strategies that balance information with depth and clarity, ensuring that messages are trustworthy, actionable, and responsive to multiple mental health needs. By refining digital messaging strategies, organizations can enhance the effectiveness of health communication and improve engagement with mental health resources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.