Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40608418›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2025

Marburg virus glycoprotein mRNA vaccine is more protective than a virus-like particle-forming mRNA vaccine.

Chandru Subramani, Michelle Meyer, Matthew A Hyde, Margaret E Comeaux, Haiping Hao, James E Crowe, Vsevolod L Popov, Harshwardhan Thaker, Sunny Himansu, Andrea Carfi and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. mRNA Vaccines for Influenza: Hope for a Universal Vaccine?BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Application of Orthoflavivirus Pseudovirus Technology in Antiviral Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Chandru SubramaniDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) at Galveston, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Michelle MeyerDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) at Galveston, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Matthew A HydeAnimal Resources Center and.
Margaret E ComeauxAnimal Resources Center and.
Haiping HaoDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, UTMB, Galveston, Texas, USA.
James E CroweVanderbilt Vaccine Center.
Vsevolod L PopovDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) at Galveston, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Harshwardhan ThakerDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) at Galveston, Galveston, Texas, USA.
Sunny HimansuModerna Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Andrea CarfiModerna Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Alexander BukreyevDepartment of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) at Galveston, Galveston, Texas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although virus-like particle (VLP) vaccines were shown to be effective against several viruses, their advantage over vaccines that include envelope protein only is not completely clear, particularly for mRNA-encoded VLPs. We conducted a side-by-side comparison of the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of mRNA vaccines encoding the Marburg virus (MARV) full-length glycoprotein (GP) delivered alone or as a VLP. Electron microscopy confirmed VLP formation when MARV GP and matrix protein VP40 were coexpressed. We vaccinated guinea pigs with a 2-component mRNA vaccine encoding GP and VP40 (VLP) or GP alone. At the highest dose, both vaccines protected fully, although the VLP vaccine elicited a slightly lower humoral response than did the GP-only mRNA vaccine. However, at low doses, GP-only mRNA conferred 100% protection, whereas the VLP vaccine conferred only partial protection. In mice, VLP mRNA induced a moderate preference for GP-specific CD8+ T cell responses, whereas the GP-only mRNA somewhat favored CD4+ T cell responses. Guinea pig whole-blood RNA-Seq revealed that the VLP vaccine downregulated genes associated with various biological and metabolic processes, including the NF-κB signaling pathway, whereas the GP-only vaccine upregulated IFN signaling. Overall, the VLP mRNA vaccine was less immunogenic and protective, whereas the GP-only mRNA vaccine conferred robust protection with a dose of as little as 1 μg in guinea pigs.

Indexed as

GlycoproteinsMarburgvirusMarburg Virus DiseaseRNA, MessengerVaccines, Virus-Like ParticleViral VaccinesAnimalsCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesFemaleGuinea PigsMicemRNA VaccinesVaccines, SyntheticGlycoproteinsmRNA VaccinesRNA, MessengerVaccines, SyntheticVaccines, Virus-Like ParticleViral VaccinesCellular immune responseImmunoglobulinsInfectious diseaseVaccinesVirology

Identifiers

PMID40608418
PMCPMC12490202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.