Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40608408›Full record

Observational studyJMIR research protocols2025

Remote Monitoring by ViQtor Upon Implementation on a Surgical Department (REQUEST-Trial): Protocol for a Prospective Implementation Study.

Ephrahim E Jerry, Arthur R Bouwman, Simon W Nienhuijs

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06574867 (REQUEST - RemotE Monitoring by viQtor Upon Implementation on a Surgical departmenT), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06574867 completednot on this map

REQUEST - RemotE Monitoring by viQtor Upon Implementation on a Surgical departmenT

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorCatharina Ziekenhuis EindhovenRan2024 to 2025Enrolled500ConditionsMonitoring, Post-operative Monitoring, Patient Safety, Healthcare Technology ImplementationArmsviQtor Wearable Monitoring Device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Observational
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ephrahim E JerryDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0006-7871-5884
Arthur R BouwmanDepartment of Anestesiology, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2051-5947
Simon W NienhuijsDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Ziekenhuis, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0104-9477

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContinuous monitoring of patients' vital signs is critical for early detection of postoperative complications. Traditional manual monitoring by nursing staff is time-consuming and provides only intermittent data. Wearable devices offer continuous monitoring capabilities, potentially enhancing early warning systems, reducing nurse workload, and facilitating earlier patient discharge. However, research on their implementation and effectiveness in clinical settings remains limited.

objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the implementation and feasibility of continuous monitoring using photoplethysmography sensor technology (a viQtor device) in a surgical ward. We will also assess the impact on nursing workload and the usability of this workflow.

methodsThe REQUEST (Remote Monitoring by viQtor Upon Implementation on a Surgical Department) study is a prospective observational implementation study conducted over 8 months in a surgical ward. The vital signs of 500 postoperative patients will be continuously monitored using the viQtor device, which measures heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation. The study consists of 2 phases: an initial period with manual spot checks, followed by a phase using the wearable device as the primary monitoring tool. Outcomes include the Integrated Workload Scale for nursing workload and a framework evaluating acceptability, feasibility, adoption, and sustainability. Data collection involves device performance metrics, questionnaires (the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale and the System Usability Scale), and thematic analysis of focus groups.

resultsStaff training was completed in October 2024, and full implementation is ongoing. Preliminary findings, including data on usability and workload, are expected by July 2025.

conclusionsThis study will provide insight into the practical implementation of continuous vital sign monitoring in surgical care. The findings may support future adoption of wearable technology in clinical workflows.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06574867; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06574867. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/70707.

Indexed as

PhotoplethysmographyPostoperative ComplicationsWearable Electronic DevicesFeasibility StudiesHumansMonitoring, PhysiologicProspective StudiesSurgery Department, HospitalVital Signsearly warning systemimplementationmonitoringvital signswearable deviceworkload

Identifiers

PMID40608408
PMCPMC12271956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.