ArticleJMIR AI2025
Leveraging Large Language Models for Accurate Retrieval of Patient Information From Medical Reports: Systematic Evaluation Study.
Article in JMIR AI, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Attitudes Toward Large Language Models in Health Care and Preferences for Their Adoption and Oversight Among Health Care Professionals: Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Zero-Shot Classification of Postoperative Complications From Real-World Discharge Letters According to the Clavien-Dindo System Using Large Language Models in Liver Surgery: Comparative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Article
- Accelerating real-world data collection using large language models in rare neoplasms: a bone sarcoma example.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- AI-powered Chatbot integration for enhanced accessibility of electronic health records in a pediatric hospital.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Large language models in clinical trials: applications, technical advances, and future directions.BMC medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe digital transformation of health care has introduced both opportunities and challenges, particularly in managing and analyzing the vast amounts of unstructured medical data generated daily. There is a need to explore the feasibility of generative solutions in extracting data from medical reports, categorized by specific criteria.
objectiveThis study aimed to investigate the application of large language models (LLMs) for the automated extraction of structured information from unstructured medical reports, using the LangChain framework in Python.
methodsThrough a systematic evaluation of leading LLMs-GPT-4o, Llama 3, Llama 3.1, Gemma 2, Qwen 2, and Qwen 2.5-using zero-shot prompting techniques and embedding results into a vector database, this study assessed the performance of LLMs in extracting patient demographics, diagnostic details, and pharmacological data.
resultsEvaluation metrics, including accuracy, precision, recall, and F
conclusionsThe findings highlight notable differences in precision and recall between models, particularly in extracting names and age-related information. There were challenges in processing unstructured medical text, including variability in model performance across data types. Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of integrating LLMs into health care workflows; LLMs offer substantial improvements in data accessibility and support clinical decision-making processes. In addition, the paper describes the role of retrieval-augmented generation techniques in enhancing information retrieval accuracy, addressing issues such as hallucinations and outdated data in LLM outputs. Future work should explore the need for optimization through larger and more diverse training datasets, advanced prompting strategies, and the integration of domain-specific knowledge to improve model generalizability and precision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.