SynthesisJAMA oncology2025
First-Line Therapy For Advanced Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in JAMA oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficacy and safety of cabozantinib plus nivolumab in advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a nationwide multicenter study.Oncoimmunology · 2026Article
- Article
- Hong Kong Urological Association-Hong Kong Society of Uro-Oncology 2025 consensus on the management of locally advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Case Report: The integration of chemoradiotherapy and immunotherapy in a patient with advanced-stage renal squamous cell carcinoma and pulmonary metastases.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas (nccRCCs) present considerable challenges owing to their heterogeneity and limited clinical trial representation. Understanding the benefits of combining immunotherapy and targeted therapy for these subtypes is crucial for improving patient outcomes. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of various first-line immunotherapy combinations and targeted therapy in treating metastatic nccRCC. Data Sources: A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from inception until December 31, 2024, using relevant keywords and medical subject headings terms. Study Selection: Studies were included if they involved patients with nccRCC, reported on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies, and provided data on objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and disease control rate (DCR). Data extraction and Synthesis: Two independent reviewers extracted data, with discrepancies resolved by a third expert. Observational study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic. Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcomes of interest were ORR, PFS, OS, and DCR. Results: The analysis included 23 studies encompassing various subtypes of nccRCC. Pooled results indicated an ORR of 26.6% and a DCR of 57.8% for nccRCC treatments. Median PFS was 6.59 months, and the median OS was 21.11 months. ICIs demonstrated significant efficacy in nccRCC, exhibiting marked clinical activity across different subtypes. Although monotherapy with ICIs showed effectiveness, combination therapies yielded superior clinical outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that ICIs, particularly when combined with targeted therapies, showed promising efficacy in treating metastatic nccRCC. These findings support their integration into treatment guidelines and emphasize the importance of personalized treatment strategies. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes, safety profiles, and the identification of biomarkers to optimize patient selection and improve outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.