Observational studyDrug safety2025
The Effect of Opioid Agonist Treatment on Injection-Related Sequelae: A Population-Based Observational Study.
Observational study in Drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionOpioid agonist treatment (OAT) reduces drug-related poisonings and injection-related infections among people with opioid use disorder (OUD). Despite buprenorphine-naloxone (BNX) and methadone (MET) both being first-line OAT options in Canada, their comparative effectiveness in preventing recurrent injection-related infections and poisonings remains unclear.
objectivesThis study compared the effectiveness of buprenorphine-naloxone and methadone in reducing recurrent risks of injection-related bacterial infections and opioid-related poisoning among people on OAT.
methodsWe used administrative health data from Québec, Canada to create our cohort of adult patients (aged 18-65 years) on OAT maintenance between 2014 and 2019. We applied a time-dependent Cox proportional hazards model for our time-varying exposure definition to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the recurrent risks of injection-related bacterial infections and opioid-related poisoning, adjusting for age, sex, socio-demographic, and clinical factors. We also compared the effectiveness of buprenorphine-naloxone and methadone during the OAT induction phase (i.e., first 30 days of treatment).
resultsThe study population included 2010 patients (mean age: 41.21 years, 67.41% male). Compared to methadone, buprenorphine-naloxone was associated with 45% lower recurrent risk of opioid-related poisoning (HR: 0.55; 95% CI 0.35-0.86). Overall, the association between buprenorphine-naloxone and recurrent risk of injection-related bacterial infections suggested a weak protective effect (HR: 0.80; 95% CI 0.59-1.09). During the induction phase, there was limited evidence of differences between buprenorphine-naloxone and methadone for the recurrent risks of injection-related bacterial infections (HR: 0.91; 95% CI 0.51-1.60) and opioid-related poisoning (HR: 1.07; 95% CI 0.51-2.24).
conclusionAmong patients in OAT maintenance, buprenorphine-naloxone was associated with lower risk of recurrent opioid-related poisoning compared to methadone, but not for injection-related infections. This advantage was not observed during induction, suggesting the need for improved treatment retention early in OAT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40608239What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.